The first 'I Am' separates the universally interdependent coherent Me~Mind, living one time forward lifetime, from within, At the same time linguistically sound verifiable statements like, I am not my body, I am not my sensations, I am not my feelings, I am not my thoughts fragements Mi~iMind using linguistic bound self reflection that are fraught with confusion caused by the obvious Me~Mind observantions that I have thoughts, feelings, sensations and a body. The hidden antynomy in lingusitcs that makes self reflection impossible is more often illustrated using the simple sentence 'This sentence is false' , however this does not make clear how this underlying limitation in natural language causes infinite amounts of fragmentation using the infinities between 1 and zero.
antynomy that pollute emergent knowledge processing. Language cannot say what I am although it may say what I am not if a capable human Me~Mind has access to the knowable unnameable.
When the argument for a sincerely held belief uses an invalid premise the error cannot be located from the corollary, inferences or deductions. If we begin from a sincere erroneous belief that we are separate from the universe where we coherently exist then we are adrift in a delusion before we self reflect.
Using a simple deontic winnowing method lonliness can be disabused of the soundness of its reliance upon a hoi polloi rationalization.
Upskilling the Inner Critic charecter derived from hoi polloi iStates with powerful new critical skills can remove weaknesses in the Inner Critics perceptions which may be polluting the processing of knowledge. How often has the inner Critic said when will I ever learn in relationship to the witnessing of the recurrence of error in judgements.