When my life led me to understand that my mother had been abandoned by my father it became an ideological belief for me that a father should not abandon a mother of his children in penury and purdur?// isolated from family and friends. The very sincerity of the view that fired my commitment made me blind to other important aspects of becoming a father as a result of an unplanned pregnancy.

Fathers teach survival skills from their own experiences if your father was a banker the advice you get may concern mortgages and pensions, if a teacher then adding to betterment of mankind or a tradesman the benefits of trade craft and business or a Philosopher where understanding the roots of knowledge becomes the nature sought upon the pathways of life. What children do not need is somebody who does all of these things intermittently, while transiting from one to the other via iconoclastic intervals where the limitations of the last certain pathway are rasped from their roots with new proofs of rot in the roots making nowhere secure enough to come to adulthood in for the child.

If your father is sincerely just one kind of wrong then you have a target to work with if scattered then the sands of time are experienced as insecure. The sands of time reveal everything in life to be insecure but do we need to experience this while we are in the early stages of our development.

When I was a child in the 1960's the drunks at the back of Christmas midnight mass were the first overt signs I saw that the devotions to the Catholic religion and the rituals was an ala carte choice in the Ireland of that time. Grown men unable to stand still, belching and farting Guinness fumes over the people returning with God in their mouth past the end of the church as they returned around the back of the pews from the alter with the open tabernacle proved that even in our God's house the unforgiven sinners walked with the blessed, a stew mixed with the hypocrisy that swirled within and from the church. Had I been at Christmas midnight mass in Rathdrum some of those drunken men would most likely have been some of the men who buried the babies without ritual from the mother and baby homes, one of which I had survived.

There is a deep sense of loss when we discover our parents are living in a delusion and while the members of the more conventional Judeo Christian religions consider themselves immune to delusion they will often view Mormons or Jehovah Witnesses as delusional, while they themselves pray to statues and dismembered heads of deceased Saints and martyrs without any sense that they are deluded.

Why Louder Isn’t Better: Mindfulness Beyond Language

For over a century, Western culture has endeavoured to adapt and amplify mindfulness practices, often transforming them into systems that promise solutions for everything from stress to self-actualization. Yet, in this drive for reinvention, much of the profound simplicity and depth of mindfulness has been lost in translation.
The truth is this: mindfulness, as understood through the Two Truths doctrine, cannot be captured, let alone achieved, by language alone. In fact, the very tools we often use to grasp mindfulness—words, systems, and intellectual frameworks—can obscure its essence.

The Two Truths: Conventional and Ultimate Reality

Central to Buddhist philosophy is the doctrine of the Two Truths:
1. Conventional Truth: The world of language, symbols, and socially constructed concepts. This is where we navigate daily life, using distinctions like good/bad, self/other, and success/failure.
2. Ultimate Truth: The realization of emptiness—that all phenomena are interdependent and lack inherent existence. There is no arising, no ceasing, and no separateness.
Modern adaptations of mindfulness often focus on the conventional realm, layering it with therapeutic goals or personal development aspirations. While these approaches can provide temporary relief or structure, they fail to address the root of suffering: the attachment to the very constructs they aim to refine.
The Overreach of Language
In the West, mindfulness has been rebranded and repackaged repeatedly:
• Integral theories promise “complete” systems of thought, attempting to unify all perspectives.
• Therapeutic mindfulness emphasizes “presence,” yet often ties it to performance metrics like productivity or emotional regulation.
• Psychedelic movements offer glimpses of altered states but struggle to integrate these experiences without reinforcing dualities.
These efforts share a common limitation: they remain bound to language and dualistic thinking. The louder these voices proclaim their effectiveness, the further they drift from the quiet realization at the heart of mindfulness: no arising, no falling away.
Mathematics: A Language Beyond Duality
This is where the Mi-iMind Framework offers a distinct approach. Rather than relying on language, it employs mathematics as a universal tool to:
• Model dynamic, interdependent systems that reflect the nature of emptiness.
• Provide precision without attachment to meaning, enabling process-oriented understanding.
• Align with the emergent nature of knowledge, allowing insights to arise without distortion.
Mathematical principles like Euler’s number (e) and fractals mirror the insights of the Two Truths, offering a framework for understanding that transcends linguistic constructs.
Listening to Silence
True mindfulness is not something that can be achieved, as there is nothing to achieve. Instead, it is a cessation of imputed separations, a quiet recognition that there was never a division to begin with. The teachings of the Heart Sutra remind us:
“Form is emptiness, emptiness is form.”
The Mi-iMind Framework honours this simplicity by:
• Encouraging EmptiSelf conception, which allows the Me-Mind to open the present without the constraints of language-bound self-conceptions.
• Prioritizing process purposes over static goals, fostering adaptability and openness.
• Grounding its methods in the silent awareness of emptiness rather than the noise of constructed meaning.
Why Louder Isn’t Better
The Western tradition of louder, bigger mindfulness systems reflects a fundamental misunderstanding: the belief that more input leads to greater insight. True understanding arises not from amplification but from cessation:
• Stop adding noise: Let go of the need to redefine or repackage mindfulness.
• Start listening: Pay attention to the silence from which all understanding emerges.
This is not a rejection of language or systems but an acknowledgment of their limits. The Mi-iMind Framework provides tools to navigate these limitations, enabling individuals to engage with the present in a way that is free, open, and adaptive.
The Path Forward
As you explore the Mi-iMind Framework, consider this question:
What would it mean to let silence speak for itself?
By stepping away from the noise of language-bound constructs and embracing the interdependent, emergent nature of reality, you can begin to experience mindfulness as it truly is: a state of openness, free from arising and falling away.
The answers have always been with us. We simply need to stop looking for them so loudly.