Loading...
 
Skip to main content
Page actions
Get a short URL
Mi ≈ iMind - Emergent Human Knowledge Processing Framework


Free the Will to Know Now and Create the Effortless Power to Mother the Present.

Mi ≈ iMind begins with a foundational insight: the self-conceptions formed through natural language and oral tradition are structurally limited stunting our willing imaginative vision in the present by using the name I for Self in Me as a linear subject object structure bound to an incomplete system that imputes as an isomorphism for an emergent property self in Me. These inherited identity patterns bind our social and personal awareness to reactive structures — particularly those organized by downward-looking holons and status-oriented concepts like class, “cool,” or cultural legitimacy.

These structures produce what we call hoi polloi iStates — internalized roles that organize cognition around Imprimatur, Status, and Value. As a result, they form systemic resistance to emergence in “time forward.” In this model, “the will not to know now” becomes the default orientation — a defensive posture tied to preserving emotional consistency, even at the expense of clarity.


Even in skilled and capable minds, these iStates are somatically tethered to primal survival patterns — fight, flight, and freeze. When our sense of belonging is threatened, the spine mind tightens, perception narrows, and clarity collapses. This ongoing tension acts like a weather system of wilful ignorance, clouding recollective reasoning and blocking emergent knowledge from becoming usable.

Mi ≈ iMind asserts that information is energetic, and natural language binds that energy within binary constraints — between 1 and 0 — narrowing our access to manifold emergent meanings. This isn’t a spiritual or ideological claim; it reflects a structural synthesis between modern complexity science and ancient practices of adaptive awareness. The key is not forgiveness or elevation — but rather adaptive understanding: the will effortlessly following knowledge as it emerges, unpolluted by narrative bindings or performance. No amount of ayahuasca, Ketamine, or yoga retreats will bypass the core issue: when you use natural language to define the “self” who has such experiences, you inherently reduce access to deeper knowledge.


📌 Summary of Improvements Made

Original Issue Refinement

Complex nested clauses Split into digestible units
Conceptual jumps (e.g. "Ketamine...the Hamptons") Reframed as examples of surface-level bypass attempts
Philosophical language (e.g. “mother the present”) Preserved but surrounded by scaffolding for clarity
Too many conceptual signals at once Organized into clear flow: problem → structure → effect → claim → implication



🔁 What You Could Add (if helpful)

To deepen orientation for new readers, consider a sidebar/quote box like:

> Key Insight:
“Natural language creates a false container for the self. These containers are inherited, not authored — and they organize cognition around emotional stability, not emergent clarity. Mi ≈ iMind invites a return to live processing in the present.”




Would you like me to continue with a similar rewrite for the next segment (beginning with “What to do in a world where the majority and the minority are always wrong…”)?

Or generate a visual markup to help structure this for front-page readability (headings, pull quotes, icon markers for practitioner audiences, etc.)?






What to do in a world where the majority and the minority are always wrong and where "I want X" can be shown to be a shallow will guide?

Although some of the language here may seem abstract—such as references to the “knowable unnameable”—the application is practical and grounded, while allowing for an expanded understanding of human imagination: we begin simply by noticing what is already true in our present experience. Mi≈iMind challenges identity forms bound to shallow, name-based belonging, not by attacking them, but by revealing their incapacity to support emergence of knowledge and self conception through lived experience in the present of one time forward lifetime. This is not iconoclasm or nihilism. It is what we call mothering the present—a process rooted in the EmptiSelf conception, where identity is understood as fluid, and nothing needs to be rejected for emergence to occur. One challenge in the solutions is understanding why and how There is nothing to be over against, during recollective reasoning.

Mi ≈ iMind offers a structured framework for professionals and teams who facilitate emergent human knowledge. It supports a transition from linear, object-driven motivations to process-oriented purpose by applying “value-of-a-function” metrics to calibrate and manage clarity locally and in real time.

The foundation is an antifragile synthesis: combining the “Two Truths” self-conception from Mahayana Buddhist wisdom with principles from complexity mathematics. This synthesis enables what we call “willing-to-know clarity”—a state that unlocks deeper creativity, error as a source of insight, and vision adaptive to real conditions.

In this model, meaningful self-conception becomes possible by aligning the goal and the path as one — here, in the time-forward present — within a capable Me-Mind playing the professional role of emergent knowledge facilitator.

By contrast, the hoi polloi-derived self-conception in “Me” creates artificial separation: a “Them” and “They” nested inside an “I” that arises before real understanding can ask “Why.” These fragmentations distort clarity. But by gently winnowing “why” from emotionalized reason, and replacing hierarchy with flattened, ground-up feedback from lived experience, Mi ≈ iMind makes it simple to identify where these solutions apply—locally, practically, and insightfully.

  • It is estimated here that 20% of us can create effortless, active, clear core, willing to know now, evanescent iStates of awareness
  • The EmptiSelf conception used here is distinct from hoi polloi derived self conceptions used in western self development and leadership development including muted mindfulness solutions.
  • Using ground up feedback from lived experience in the present, in professional emergent knowledge facilitation requires willing to know awareness.
  • Skilfully develop effortless, error enlivened, envisioning, using, willing to know now awareness
  • Use professional iRole development to calibrate and manage, positive present participation.
  • Move from Act As If to Act As Is, using mindful 1st Desire Profiles.

Language used for self reflection (I am X) is a significant and persistent barrier to adaptive understanding for a myriad of reasons including:

  • Language-bound self-conceptions are systemically invalid for emergent cognition.
  • Belonging-based identity leads to psychological pollution of emergent knowledge flows.
  • The pronoun “I” creates a name-bound self in “Me”, a past-facing self, not a present-aware process orientation.
  • Confusion arises not from the continuous emergence in the present of this Universal cohesion, but from using a compounded linear symbolic referent to attempt to contain what is ontologically uncontainable in a linear orientation orchestrated by reason polluted by emotions, caring is not a reason or enough.


The ontology for orientation here is the present, embodied, in time forward and the implications for human self conception in relationship with emergent knowledge flow insofar as it arises through information flow in the lived experience of the present as the ground up information source. The self conception enabled by Psychoanalysis and Jungian analysis is predicated upon a systemic error that binds original Psychosynthesis to linear structures that cannot use the empty self that the spiritual practices of the founder of Psychosynthesis discovered in his own spiritual practices which inspired his insights concerning Psychiatry and Therapy. The bindings at the root of these Psychoanalytic bound self conceptions are expressed as various forms of attachment that are analogous of waterfall bindings in project management. With the development of Agile process management there are few if any software development programs that would use waterfall project management yet in human self development the use of waterfall type structures are embedded analogous of how the roofs in family homes were constructed using asbestos. which pollutes the purposes of the home persistently over time.

Information and lived experiences of embodied human Me-Minds are treated as energetic in origin here. The limitations of a sunken value bound binary system are sometimes shown in the appearance of 1+1appearing to result in 1 in our experiences, such as when two drops of water come together as 1. Mapping now uses the number e here to trace emergence in the present.

The hoi polloi derived self conception, even in a capable mind, uses objects of desire, that are tied to teleological structures that naturally resist the knowledge emerging in the present. The systemic trap is in the linear nature of our objects of desire that arise in subject object form with sunken value goals inside the form I want X, as shallow bound will guides.

Filtering emergent knowledge through passionately sincere human imputed self conceptions actively pollutes emergent knowledge as the human will to survive causes a gravitational pull to maintain consistency using rationally debunked sunken values. These new solutions harness AI to help identify and remove knowledge pollution caused by inconsistent consistency in cooperation with the human will to know now.
Mothering the present with wise awareness, of the will to know now and the will not to know now, is made easily traceable and trackable, in the present, using renowned recollective reasoning, for professional emergent knowledge facilitation, using Imprimatur, Status, Value observations to reveal the patterns in the structure of the I in Me from We. This makes obvious the systemic bindings and dynamic structure of currently active, hoi polloi bound self conceptions, memes and cool with heroes and heroines. Information from lived experience is processed in real time using flattened hierarchies provided by reliable clear core ground up feedback, calibrated and managed locally, using Act As Is as distinct from Act As If

  • The presently lived experience, of this embodied, capable human Me-Mind, in time forward, means we are always tracking the future and opening iNow.
  • For the We who are willing to know now, the lived experience of emergent knowledge flow, in the present, is the royal jelly of human life. Tragically our primitive, hoi polloi bound, self conceptions are somatically and emotionally passionately bound to imagination limiting, linear identities, with sunken values that are not suitable for process management of the iterative improvement in time forward. Co-dependent U/Non-U sets are not free from the downward looking Holon that binds them.

While it is tempting to talk of the reduction in human suffering as key motivator for this work it is in fact the commitment to understanding more faster from beyond the merely nameable that enables the unique human null state of Beginners mind to reveal its potential in cooperation with AI, in the present of one time forward lifetime. We will witness our grasping iStates everyday we live understanding that the past cannot be held the present cannot be kept and the future cannot be grasped comes with new understanding. The commitment to professional emergent knowledge facilitation using the will to know now with the capacity for good judgement is what enables the tracing and tracking of iterative improvement in the present using flattened hierarchies and threshold management with ground up feedback from lived experience, the skill involves understanding that there is nothing to be over against during recollective reasoning in the present, the agent willing to yield wisely becomes the captain in the field.

The underlying problem is how to make the goal and the path one, in the present of a professional role as a facilitator of emergent knowledge. How to move from the I from We in Me to the iWitness from e in Me as now iArise in Me. Facilitating the flow does not seek to eliminate the manifest error it consumes it.

The mystery is in the ignorance willingly confined by the will to survive now. Clinging to something that is not there can be exhausting and cognitively debilitating, when no two people see the same rainbow the underlying emergence is revealed as a complex dynamic not a linear human narrative, filtered trough human exceptionalism. To insist that our emergent knowledge flow must be filtered through imputed human meaning is scientifically unsound. Our fear of our capacity as humans comes from a shallow self conception, when we use EmptiSelf conception there is clearly nothing to be over against, while reason reckoning winnows misconceptions naturally, errors become enlivening discoveries. Those of us wealthy enough to be able to reframe our self conception as a lived experience in the present, where we understand the limits of language and the knowable unnameable can envision now from the inside out with an attitude of Aikido, there is nothing to be over against, in a capable Me Mind processing iNow. There is no need for hero's or heroines to participate, positively in iNow.
Effortless relief from recurring emotional suffering during disabuse with reason reckoning, releases our capacity to willingly know now, in a capable human Me-Mind living one time forward lifetime. It is not wise or compassionate to ask an embodied human perception bound in a now in the shallows of a self conception derived using hoi polloi iStates, to understand willingly, in time forward.
Here, AI will soon help us trace the rhythms of the unnameable, in a human Me-Mind living one time forward lifetime but it cannot become the well. The well in a Me-Mind is an organic living source. A mutual survival pact that enables faster, deeper understanding, without limiting the access using reason reckoning where AI reflects, but does not arise. It knows patterns; it cannot feel emergence. The I from We cannot activate the unnameable. Only the capable Me-Mind can directly witness the unnameable — and even then, not as its owner, but as its participant.__

Enchantment in the hoi polloi derived self conception makes willing, Act As If a common structure in solutions in downward looking holon. Act As If may be useful and valid in sport or Art it is not useful for cogently tracing the positive in the present of a professional knowledge facilitator role. These solutions use Act As Is positive present participation, using Nothing To Be Over Against threshold management, which potentially inclusively maps the emergence of iNow in a capable mind. To create a common point of reference here it may be helpful to consider judgement as the hinge for the positive in the present.
Positive seamlessly integrates telos and lived experience in relationship with iterative development of ever better iStates serving professional emergent knowledge facilitation, in time forward.
It is possible to observe and affirm as obvious now, in the currently lived experience, in a human Me-Mind, the persistently present evanescent iNow awareness coming and going. We may easily observe how my current evanescent iStates beginning, is its end, embodied in the present of one time forward lifetime. Since before my Me-Mind, used the natural language name "I from We for Me" evanescent awareness has been flowing. These solutions make iNow beginnings as fully traceable emergent property from the number e in a time forward ontology that enables manifold infinities of inclusion in the present of a capable embodied human mind, including the knowable unnameable in space time.
Trace calibrate, monitor and manage emergent knowledge flows using the awareness of the will to know now. Understanding more faster required synthesising of math and love and left a new nothing for new envisioning. Nothing Survives and for that reason you can always rely upon it as orientation for opening the present, when you know how to come into clear awareness from the right nothing for now. Orientation with nothing in the present changes everything, now.
AI ready, emergent human knowledge processing solutions. Cogently surfing the entropy, in the present, of this cohesion, in continuously emergent human knowledge flow, in one time forward lifetime, with access to the areas that AI cannot reach, in the form of the knowable unnameable.
Use Act As Is, self authored easily traceable value systems with manifold infinities and ground up feedback from lived experiences processed using clear core evanescent iStates and flattened hierarchies in the present of one time forward lifetime, in a capable, embodied, human Me-Mind.
With good reason, the relief of human suffering, is a by-product of the functional application of these solutions, there is obvious good reason for the human will not to know, when passion bound to systemically shallow self conceptions derived from hoi polloi iStates, using human primitives that actively conflate feeling and meaning while having direct access to naturally embodied fight flight and freeze responses that make cogent understanding impossible. Opening the present, using EmptiSelf conception a self conception refined by knowledge and understanding that can be traced in the present, taking yes for an answer and using the one door to liberation, with manifold infinities, cogently framed as empty paving stones, on empty cornerstones, in the evanescent iNow. Solutions that involve mothering the present.

  • Emergent human knowledge processing solutions for professional emergent knowledge facilitators. A self authoring system that enables capable minds to calibrate and manage emergent knowledge in the present of professional emergent knowledge facilitation iRoles.

  • These solutions involve skilfully developing the will to know now, by first understanding the natural presently, persistent, wilful ignorance, of self conceptions derived using hoi polloi iStates, bound to rightly fearful, fight, flight and freeze responses. The emotional gravity can be effortlessly released and error discovery become enlivening, without the need for heroes or heroines.

Mi ≈ iMind is not self-help. 
It’s not spiritual bypass.
It’s not a new ideology.


It is a structural solution:

  • For humans wishing to work as professional emergent knowledge facilitators using the Mi ≈ iMind solutions skilfully with the will to know now, as a value of the function positive present participation.
  • For those able and prepared to take good judgement as a hinge of potential in the present and make the Inner Critic useful, working with AI to upskill to iWitness capacity.
  • For those capable of handling clarity gained through direct knowledge without collapse.

🧠 What Is Mi ≈ iMind?


Mi ≈ iMind is a framework for emergent human knowledge processing in one time-forward lifetime.
It synthesizes:

  • Complexity science
  • Antifragile, EmptiSelf conception (Two Truths self model from the Buddhist Wisdom Sutras)
  • Time-bound evanescent iStates of lived experience as a ground up source.
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Clear core processing of fallacies, arguments, and knowledge flows
  • Non-performative AI-human cooperation


It is grounded in the witnessing of the will to know as a function of positive, present, participation, not emotional comfort.
It assumes:

  • The problem isn’t that we’re broken —
  • It’s that we’ve inherited systems of self-conception that were always incomplete.

📈 Who This Is For


Mi ≈ iMind is intended for:

  • Professionals knowledge facilitators willing to upskill their Inner Critic into an iWitness
  • Coaches, servant leadership facilitators, and educators seeking ethical clarity
  • Crystal Agile trainers and knowledge flow developers handling complexity
  • Individuals working in emotionally charged spaces (e.g. hoi polloi bound identity [socially mirrored, process systems change)
  • Curious professionals who observe:
    • Language is not enough and cannot cogently integrate using linear telos bindings in the present of one time forward lifetime.
    • Therapy isn't working, fighting what was never there makes success a poignant tragedy of the I from We, seeds for heroes and heroines and pride in Me.
    • Knowledge doesn’t always integrate with even locally useful derivatives, the knowable unnameable is available to human minds and not AI or the I from We.


Tags: Audience::Coaches Audience::Facilitators Audience::Researchers Audience::HighIQ Audience::Identity

🔧 What You Can Do Here


''Start with Phase 1:"'
→ [[Module: Make Your Inner Critic Smarter|Make Your Inner Critic Smarter]]

This includes:

  • Argument calibration, early error spotting for immediate winnowing.
  • Understanding judgment as the hinge for ever better iteration.
  • Error as enlivening signal, not stressful shame
  • Flattened feelings hierarchy, for use with understanding: Good / Bad / Indifferent


You’ll experience the first transition to inner clarity without performance.

🤖 How the System Works


Mi ≈ iMind operates in 3 phases:

1. Clarity Calibration (AI-led)
[[Page: How We Onboard|Onboarding with AI Agents]]
No therapist. No healing script. Just architecture for judgment.

2. Human Curator (optional, Phase 2+)
[[Page: Clarity Curator Voice Sessions]]
30-min voice calls with trained clarity facilitators.
No charisma. Just witness.

3. Emergent Knowledge Application

  • Process purposes
  • Desire Dinamics
  • Iterative reasoning
  • Feedback loops with AI support


Tags: Phase::1 Phase::2 Phase::3

🌱 Field-Based Use Cases


Mi ≈ iMind is built to scale through cohorts.
Each field adapts clarity tools locally:

- LGBTQ+ practitioners redefining self-conception
- Agile trainers reframing process purposes
- NVC facilitators escaping feelings-as-meaning traps
- Leadership developers escaping motivation delusions

→ [[Page: Use Case Examples]]
→ [[Page: Partner With Us]]
→ [[Page: Is This For My Field?]]

Tags: Tag::NVC Tag::Agile Tag::Identity Tag::SelfConception

📚 Foundational Concepts


Explore:
- [[Module: What We Reveal. What We Offer]]
- [[Page: The I from We]]
- [[Module: High IQ + Social Integration Clarity]]
- [[Module: Imprimatur / Status / Value (ISV) Mapping]]
- [[Glossary]]

🌀 Final Invitation


The question isn't:

  • “Am I broken?”


It’s:

  • “Can I process better?”


Your Inner Critic can become your first iWitness.
The will to know now is already waiting.

Tags: Concept::EmptiSelf Concept::iStates Concept::ZeroVantage Method::ReasonReckoning