Loading...
 
Skip to main content
Without denying a present that arises in time forward, how can we who are willing to know, make sense when we discover, using new knowledge, that no two human minds see the same rainbow, with our eyes, or our I's and clearly no embodied Me-Mind enters the same discursive evanescent iState twice in one time forward lifetime?

The emotional societal upheaval caused by the apparent passing of God is an obvious lesson for the we who are willing to know now. The consequences of the passing of meaning from discursive self conception reveals a new danger related to the loss of something that was never there. Complexity science now gives us a way to arise cogently with meaningful presence when we use EmptiSelf conception.
While it is true that these solutions can be adapted for relief of emotional suffering the form they are shown here in IS NOT suitable for use in servant leadership or self development, counselling, therapy of Psychiatry.

Change the game to process management, make being iNow the value of a function in iNow
Use Process Purposes to self calibrate and manage Positive, Present, Participation, in time forward - create local goal and the path are one, solutions in professional Emergent Knowledge iRoles

Mi ≈ iMind Emergent Knowledge Processing Solutions - Wiki

Move from Act as if to Act as is

Create new synergies using these solutions where you can authentically witness understanding more faster using positive present participation purposes, with willing to know now iStates of awareness – Reduce the time to active adaptive understanding using Professional Emergent Knowledge Facilitation by 50%


Mi ≈ iMind begins with a basic insight: Active emergent knowledge flow is polluted by the way language encodes valid fear in identity during self talk — particularly through the use of “I” and “Me” — limits how our will to know now, is open or closed. The will to know now is not about the content it cannot be over against and be clear. When we say “I,” we often refer to a fixed, social self; when we say “Me,” we mean our reflective, feeling sense of being and knowable unnameable awareness. Language blurs this distinction, causing conflation of feelings with reasons. The result is a mental tangle — a kind of cognitive thread running between our sense of identity and our physical awareness. This confusion quietly programs how we relate to ourselves how we relate to others and how we relate to emergent knowledge that challenges our emotional and cognitive sunken values. When the satisfaction of our desires includes the will to create a false image in other peoples minds of who we are, it systemically binds us to a fearful, shallow hoi polloi self conception that is brittle and in real danger from emergent knowledge that disabuses and winnows errors./

A professional toolkit for skilful epistemic calibration and management of clarity in present willing participation using self-authored integrity in a time-forward human consciousness. To understand how to identify and hinge the active ontology in a capable mind and upskill an active inner critic using reasoning reckoning.


These inherited identity patterns give rise to what we call hoi polloi iStates: internalized private narratives such as what we commonly call our 'Inner Critic' which are bound roles formed around externally fixed authority, validation, and status — ideas like being “cool,” “legit,” or “important.” in groups that are formed using in groups that are co-dependent upon out groups. These internalized roles are survival adaptations to cultural structures that become emotionally bound belonging that reduces the fear of rejection from social structures and these fear avoidance strategies also create inertia. They push us to protect a familiar emotional reality rather than open up to what’s possible in the present.

Even in people with advanced awareness, these iStates can trigger primal stress responses. When we feel like we don’t belong or we’re being judged, our bodies react. The spine tightens, awareness shrinks, and mental clarity gives way to reactive thinking. Over time, this becomes a kind of inner climate — a weather system of avoidance that clouds clear perception and blocks new insight from taking root.

🔹 1. Orientation: What Is Mi ≈ iMind?

The framework provides easy methods for reliable orientation in the present in one time forward lifetime. Methods which enable creation of willing to know now evanescent iStates in contrast with the systemically bound hoi polloi bound iStates that are naturally wilfully ignorant for the sake of consistency in time forward. Put simply to ask a hoi polloi iState to remain consistent in time forward is to ask arithmetic to do the job of calculus or two people to see the same rainbow.
A brief introduction to the life long, shallow self simulation problem caused by isomorphic conflation of the pronoun I with self in Me. Using iWitness contrasting with clear core willing awareness, present participation is revealed as emergent in a time-forward ontology of iNow and the purpose of the solutions is to provide the process orientation required for reduction of catastrophic risk and the calibration and management of ever better present participation. Give that there patently more to a capable human Me mind than can be seen in a flat mirror by my eyes and no Me mind steps into the same iNow twice in one time forward lifetime. The disqualification of images from my eyes and the name I as self in in a capable human mind enables the new mothering of iNow in the present of time forward.

[+]

[-]

🔹 2. Simulation Primer
How the simulation arises through linear subject–object framing, language loops, and performance identities — and why it persists.

🔹 3. The I.S.V. System (Imprimatur Status Value)
Track how imprinting, status-seeking, and emotional belonging bind the “I” to habitual identities — and how this system reveals them.

🔹 4. The Inner Critic Journey
Upskilling the inner critic into the iWitness – the first pivotal step in self-authored living through winnowing and judgment clarity.

🔹 5. Reason Reckoning
Disqualify invalid arguments and false moral grammars. Learn Brandom’s Recollective Reasoning and how the system traces simulation edges.

🔹 6. Cinefyn Complexity Matrix
The visual map of emergence, entropy, and roles (Captain / Commander / Ruler). Track simulation and knowledge events across space.

🔹 7. Professional EKF Pathway
What it means to become an Emergent Knowledge Facilitator. Praxis, role alignment, and ethical guidance for self-authoring professionals.

🔹 8. Glossary of Terms
All core system terms: from “Clear Core iState” to “Flattened Hierarchy”, “Simulation Gate”, “Empty Cornerstone”, and more.

🔹 9. Simulation Escape Modules
Tile-based interactive entries for learning how to exit the simulation in daily life. Starting point for Beta test users and learners.

🔹 10. Use Cases & Applied Solutions
Where and how Mi ≈ iMind applies:
Agile teams, therapy, self-development, impostor syndrome, NVC, psychosynthesis, NLP, energy work, more.

🔹 11. Telos Reveals
Fractal insight experiences. How simulation collapses feel from the inside. “Beginner’s Mind” as epistemic refuge.

🔹 12. Blog Archive & Extended Essays
Longer form public- and private-facing writings explaining and expanding on each concept in detail.

🔹 13. Simulation Immunity Clauses
Protective phrases, frames, and understandings for safe navigation. Includes:

"What is in me is in me. There is no you in me. That is not me."